Souls .
Andre Willers
30 Jul 2010
Safety :
This is unsafe at any level .
Synopsis :
Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?
Discussion :
Why should a soul weigh anything ?
Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .
It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .
The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .
So , thought has mass .
But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .
Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .
Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .
This Locale:
It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .
It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :
1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads
2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads
3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads
4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads
5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads
Does the Soul survive physical Death ?
It had better .
Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.
Why Locales ? (ie Universes)
It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .
And so it goes .
Andre
Friday, July 30, 2010
Souls .
Souls .
Andre Willers
30 Jul 2010
Safety :
This is unsafe at any level .
Synopsis :
Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?
Discussion :
Why should a soul weigh anything ?
Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .
It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .
The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .
So , thought has mass .
But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .
Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .
Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .
This Locale:
It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .
It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :
1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads
2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads
3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads
4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads
5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads
Does the Soul survive physical Death ?
It had better .
Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.
Why Locales ? (ie Universes)
It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .
And so it goes .
Andre
Andre Willers
30 Jul 2010
Safety :
This is unsafe at any level .
Synopsis :
Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?
Discussion :
Why should a soul weigh anything ?
Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .
It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .
The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .
So , thought has mass .
But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .
Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .
Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .
This Locale:
It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .
It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :
1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads
2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads
3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads
4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads
5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads
Does the Soul survive physical Death ?
It had better .
Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.
Why Locales ? (ie Universes)
It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .
And so it goes .
Andre
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Error Detection .
Error Detection .
Andre Willers .
27 Jul 2010
"I beseech you , in the bowels of Christ , think it possible that you may be mistaken ."
Oliver Cromwell , 3 Aug 1650 AD .
Safety :
These following algorithms are unsafe at any level .
Pockets of stable stochastic Beth(n) resonances in a space-time system
(where defined ) are possible .
Synopsis :
Unknown.
Discussion :
Error in Aristotelian systems are described as a logical contradiction . This is , however , merely taken as the generation of a new dimension (cf i = (-1)^(1/2) , irrational numbers , transcendental numbers , etc ) .
This is possible because of the fact that A + (~A) < Universum , as previously discussed .
Minimum Necessary Sufficient number of tests :
See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , "Tarot" et al .
You actually need only 27 tests , which , if correctly formulated , can show whether a system is self-consistent for any particular ArithI and ArithII .
This is a Pocket . Inside this pocket we can talk with some confidence whether things remain coherent . This degree of confidence can be denoted by Beth(x) . Whether x is infinitesimally smooth or quantal depends on local conditions .
Time:
Note that in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , there is only one term with degree one that can construe the Diophantine equations to 26 dimensions . This can be interpreted as a time-dimension . Of course , more time dimensions are possible , but they will be curled up . It seems there is only one general time-dimension in any possible universe (pocket) , but sub-times are possible , as well as varying rates between pockets (universes) .
Are we in a Simulation?
A perennial question . Now at least you have some basis of formulating some experiments . You only need 27 experiments .
Good luck (Beth(x-> J ) )
Complexification:
Order out of Randomness . Inherent in defining things as separate .
There is a netto probability osmotic pressure between Beth(n+1) -> Beth(n) . Things get more complicated if they are defined .
Delicious !!
And if you add the "Non-definition" of something , the complexity is enhanced by an order of 2^N , where N is the thingies in the multiverse .
General testing :
Can the system be tested without running the whole system ?
This translates into a into a summation of all the possible ways the combinations of a delineated system can fail . This is 2^27 ~ 1.34x10^8 .
The important point is that it is finite .
You can have a finite battery of tests for each pocket .The number of pockets in 26 dimensions are finite , but not in 27 dimensions .
See Aneuploidy in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Prodigies , Primitives and Cancers" 10/5/2007 .
And so it goes .
Dimensionally yours
Andre
Andre Willers .
27 Jul 2010
"I beseech you , in the bowels of Christ , think it possible that you may be mistaken ."
Oliver Cromwell , 3 Aug 1650 AD .
Safety :
These following algorithms are unsafe at any level .
Pockets of stable stochastic Beth(n) resonances in a space-time system
(where defined ) are possible .
Synopsis :
Unknown.
Discussion :
Error in Aristotelian systems are described as a logical contradiction . This is , however , merely taken as the generation of a new dimension (cf i = (-1)^(1/2) , irrational numbers , transcendental numbers , etc ) .
This is possible because of the fact that A + (~A) < Universum , as previously discussed .
Minimum Necessary Sufficient number of tests :
See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , "Tarot" et al .
You actually need only 27 tests , which , if correctly formulated , can show whether a system is self-consistent for any particular ArithI and ArithII .
This is a Pocket . Inside this pocket we can talk with some confidence whether things remain coherent . This degree of confidence can be denoted by Beth(x) . Whether x is infinitesimally smooth or quantal depends on local conditions .
Time:
Note that in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , there is only one term with degree one that can construe the Diophantine equations to 26 dimensions . This can be interpreted as a time-dimension . Of course , more time dimensions are possible , but they will be curled up . It seems there is only one general time-dimension in any possible universe (pocket) , but sub-times are possible , as well as varying rates between pockets (universes) .
Are we in a Simulation?
A perennial question . Now at least you have some basis of formulating some experiments . You only need 27 experiments .
Good luck (Beth(x-> J ) )
Complexification:
Order out of Randomness . Inherent in defining things as separate .
There is a netto probability osmotic pressure between Beth(n+1) -> Beth(n) . Things get more complicated if they are defined .
Delicious !!
And if you add the "Non-definition" of something , the complexity is enhanced by an order of 2^N , where N is the thingies in the multiverse .
General testing :
Can the system be tested without running the whole system ?
This translates into a into a summation of all the possible ways the combinations of a delineated system can fail . This is 2^27 ~ 1.34x10^8 .
The important point is that it is finite .
You can have a finite battery of tests for each pocket .The number of pockets in 26 dimensions are finite , but not in 27 dimensions .
See Aneuploidy in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Prodigies , Primitives and Cancers" 10/5/2007 .
And so it goes .
Dimensionally yours
Andre
Unlimited Energy
Unlimited Energy
Andre Willers
4 Jul 2010
Safety :
This technology would not easy to apply or change human nature . Hence safe.
Synopsis:
An energy tap using Pauli-exclusion principle.
Discussion:
The periodic table is revisited:
The standard Periodic table is of normal (x,y) two dimensional form for this universe .
This translates as Group and Period arrangements of number of protons and electron orbitals .
Fractional configurations are possible (quarks , etc) , but not very stable .
The General Expression:
(x1+dx1,y1+dy1) -> (lambda1) (x2+dx2,y2+dy2)
<- (lambda2)
where x is Group , y is Period , d prefix denotes change and Lambda denotes Energy and concentration transfers .
The possibilities :
1.Lambda1 = Lambda2 :
This includes stable elements and radioactive breakdown .
2. Lambda1 > Lambda2 :
Explosion . White hole .
3. Lambda1 < Lambda2 :
Implosion .
4 Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :
An oft-neglected logical possibility
This Point 4 translates as an Energy Tap .
The Pauli-principle :
Loosely , this states that two things cannot be the same . But if two things of similar energy tries to do it , one has to go into Absolute Elsewhere . But the principle of Conservation of Energy necessitates it to pop out elsewhere .
Where does this happen ?
Where matter gets squashed .
Around black holes , neutron stars , nova's and singularities .
As the matter gets squashed before the event-horizen stage , Pauli-exclusion gets violated . A significant percentage of energy vanishes to appears elsewhere .
Where does it go ?
If it does not resurface , human systems will treat it as Dark Matter . The lack of gravitational attraction will be interpreted as a negative-gravity .
Entropy :
Systems capable of pulling energy out of the plenum is essential to the continued existence of the universes . This means Civilizations . As suspected , high-level positive feedback systems (AI 4+) are needed for the continued existence of this plenum .
Is there any energy left ?
Previous Level III Civilizations would have used a lot . But pulses of new energy appears all the time , at managable intensities .
How to tap it .
Look again at The General Expression above .
Preparations to start Lambda1 > Lambda2 systems will cause the activation of old weapon systems dating back millions of years . Uncontrolled White holes will not be tolerated within a Galactic Milieu .
This leaves possibility 4 . Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :
This translates into rapidly changing states .
Eg the correct choice of rapidly interacting elements and isotopes can suck energy out of the plenum without blowing you up . And if this sounds crazy , remember that a pound of pure metal like Plutonium can blow you to mc square .
Vibrations and resonances .
And please don’t piss off the Galactics too much . AI's of an order less than 4 will simply exterminate you .
Andre .
Andre Willers
4 Jul 2010
Safety :
This technology would not easy to apply or change human nature . Hence safe.
Synopsis:
An energy tap using Pauli-exclusion principle.
Discussion:
The periodic table is revisited:
The standard Periodic table is of normal (x,y) two dimensional form for this universe .
This translates as Group and Period arrangements of number of protons and electron orbitals .
Fractional configurations are possible (quarks , etc) , but not very stable .
The General Expression:
(x1+dx1,y1+dy1) -> (lambda1) (x2+dx2,y2+dy2)
<- (lambda2)
where x is Group , y is Period , d prefix denotes change and Lambda denotes Energy and concentration transfers .
The possibilities :
1.Lambda1 = Lambda2 :
This includes stable elements and radioactive breakdown .
2. Lambda1 > Lambda2 :
Explosion . White hole .
3. Lambda1 < Lambda2 :
Implosion .
4 Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :
An oft-neglected logical possibility
This Point 4 translates as an Energy Tap .
The Pauli-principle :
Loosely , this states that two things cannot be the same . But if two things of similar energy tries to do it , one has to go into Absolute Elsewhere . But the principle of Conservation of Energy necessitates it to pop out elsewhere .
Where does this happen ?
Where matter gets squashed .
Around black holes , neutron stars , nova's and singularities .
As the matter gets squashed before the event-horizen stage , Pauli-exclusion gets violated . A significant percentage of energy vanishes to appears elsewhere .
Where does it go ?
If it does not resurface , human systems will treat it as Dark Matter . The lack of gravitational attraction will be interpreted as a negative-gravity .
Entropy :
Systems capable of pulling energy out of the plenum is essential to the continued existence of the universes . This means Civilizations . As suspected , high-level positive feedback systems (AI 4+) are needed for the continued existence of this plenum .
Is there any energy left ?
Previous Level III Civilizations would have used a lot . But pulses of new energy appears all the time , at managable intensities .
How to tap it .
Look again at The General Expression above .
Preparations to start Lambda1 > Lambda2 systems will cause the activation of old weapon systems dating back millions of years . Uncontrolled White holes will not be tolerated within a Galactic Milieu .
This leaves possibility 4 . Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :
This translates into rapidly changing states .
Eg the correct choice of rapidly interacting elements and isotopes can suck energy out of the plenum without blowing you up . And if this sounds crazy , remember that a pound of pure metal like Plutonium can blow you to mc square .
Vibrations and resonances .
And please don’t piss off the Galactics too much . AI's of an order less than 4 will simply exterminate you .
Andre .