Hi ,
Merry Xmas and prosperous New Year , everybody .
Leslie , Thanks for the CUDA heads-up . (See http://www.mpronline.com "Parallel Processing with CUDA" sent by Leslie)
I was not aware that commercially available parallel processing and programming systems were so advanced .
All we need is a compiler built into the the assembly and we have a neuronal network .
Note the strong analogy with biological systems . (Not surprising)
Biological systems have threads (axons , dendrites , synapses , glials , inter-glial fluids , nano-tubes , etc)
But which parts play the role of compilers ? Are they always necessary ? Are there many different architectures , evolved for a specific purpose ?
Note the argument in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Unpacking and Packing"
Compiling can be seen as packing information , and running the program as unpacking .
The Compiler can be seen as a Beth(1) component . Directed probabilities .
Chaperones spring to mind for unpacking . As expected , it is simpler than packing . (Programming equivalents would be Java-applets , etc)
The Packer can be seen as the Evolutionary Process , and the Compiler as a part of it .
But the Compiler is a specific hardware component .
What is it known as ? It must have been seen and described , just not recognized .
Any help would be gratefully received .
Andre
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.