Thursday, November 24, 2011

Graduation and Initiation .

Graduation and Initiation .
Andre Willers
24 Nov 2011

Synopsis :
Where did these discrete thresholds come from ?
And why a period of three years ?
Why does a B- degree take three years ?

Discussion:
They are driven by entrainments of bursts of growth .
The sequence is :
0 , 3, 6, 9,12, 15,18 , 21,24, 27 , 30 , 33 ,35,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,75,78,81,84,87,90 etc
You are much more likely to die on such an anniversary after the age of 24 .(Epigenetic factors)

Why ?

See Reserve argument in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com “New Tools : Infinite Probes” Apr 2008

How to calculate what you need to survive .

Repeated in Appendix A for ease of reference.


Over an infinite length of time (ie many human generations ) , the seasonal fluctuations break up reserve build-ups into three-year pockets .

The entrainment is from the future
(ie the capability of parents and grandparents to sustain children )

How does the contraption work ?
Each start of the sequence 3,6,9, etc means the end of a three-year cycle (a Graduation) , and an Initiation into a new cycle . Humans create social mechanisms to reflect this .

The early stages (up to ages 24) are recognizably the old Graduation-Initiation ceremonies of our human ancestors .
Most Bankers , Politicians and Leaders would fail to to qualify as Human on these tests .
This is what is storming down on them with the present Hysterical Focus on Ostrum Fairness .

Graduation to Initiation .
These are paired . And they get more ferocious as the stakes increase .
Really vicious . And the participants do not even know why . Their elders do , but think this is a way of making them Men .
I would really , really like to turn a Rull-meme loose on those smug bastards .

Initiation to Graduation :
If this exceeds three years , there are penalties .

If you skip a Graduation , re-entry is much easier to try again at the 3-yearly intervals .
This is not a conscious mechanism .
Apply for a job if your age is a multiple of three .

If all else fails , contemplate your navel and practise inhaling lint .

Andre

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Appendix A

Infinite Probes 2
Andre Willers
30 April 2008
 
http://andreswhy.blogspot.com  “Infinite Probes’
 
From discussing this with various recipients , there seems to be a need for a simpler  explanation . I thought I had explained it in the simplest fashion possible . The subject matter is inherently complex .
 
But , here goes .
 
How much must you save ?
If you save too little , a random fluctuation can wipe you out .
If you save too much , you lose opportunity costs . If you are in competition , this loss can be enough to lose the competition (ie you die)
 
Intuitively , you can realize there is an optimum level of saving .
 
Methods exist of calculating this optimum in very specific instances (ie portfolios of shares ,eg Kelly criteria , or tactics in war  eg MiniMax ) .
 
The General Case
We need to hold a Reserve in case Something goes wrong . But we do not know what thing goes wrong .
 
Infinite Probes tries to answer the general case . What is really , really surprising is that a answer is possible .
 
The Infinite bit comes from using the mathematical expansion of the Definition of Eulers Constant e = ( 1 + 1/2! + 1/ 3! + … 1/n! + …)
Where n!= n*(n-1)*(n-2)*(n-3)*…*(1)
 
This approaches a constant , widely used in mathematics and physics .
(e = 2.718…) .
 
All we need is a system that can be subdivided indefinitely (to infinity) .
 
First , we divide by 1
Then 2
Then 3
Then 4
 
And so forth till infinity .
 
What is important is not  that we do know what these divisions are , only that they are possible . We also do not know which one  element goes wrong .
 
The other critical insight is that it is the relation between elements that is important . (Permutations) (The failure of an element in total isolation cannot affect the whole system by definition .)
 
We can count the number of relationships where there is failure of one element .
It is n! , where n is number of divisions where only one failure .
 
Multiple failures are handled by summing :
 
Our Reserve(R ) is divided by n to infinity and summed .
 
TotReserve= R*( 1 + 1/2! + 1/ 3! + … 1/n! + …)
TotReserve= R * e
 
To find the boundaries of our Reserve , we set TotReserve = Cost
 
Then
 
R =  1/e * Cost
R ~ 0.37 * Cost
 
What does this mean?
This method measures the upper boundary of the reserve needed to survive failures in any element of the Cost-Universe . Ie , internal fluctuations .
 
This is the surprising bit . Any society that keeps at least 37% reserves , can only be destroyed by something outside it’s envelope . It is internally stable , no matter what .
 
Empires like the Ancient Egyptians , Romans , Chinese are possible , as long as there is no climactic fluctuation , new inventions , diseases ,etc . Rare events . Hence the technological stasis of old civilizations . The two are synonymous .
 
This is true at any scale (except quantal , by definition.) .
 
Individuals too . Humans can be seen as empires of noospheres .
 
The upper boundary does not take any double-counting into account . It is true for any system whatsoever .
 
A truly remarkable precise result from such general axioms .
 
The Lower Boundaries .
This is where it gets interesting .
Remember , we are just counting the number of ways in which permutations of one element can fail . We then sum them to get the effect of the failures of other elements
 
The easiest is the business that just starts and is not selling anything . It fails on n elements on every term . It’s floor capital must then be
R=Cost/(1+e)
R=0.27*Cost
 
This is the initial reserve to get off the ground .
This is true in any ecosystem . This is why it is so difficult to start a new business , or why a new species cannot succeed . Or why waves of pandemics are scarcer .
 
For the epidemically minded , this 10% difference is responsible for the demise of the Black Death ( smallpox outcompeted bubonic plaque variants for the CR5 access site.Ironically , the reason why we have only a limited HIV plague is the high competition for this site , probably some flu vectors . As one would expect , the incidence of HIV then becomes inversely proportional to connectivity (ie flights) .
 
A cessation of airplane flights will then lead to a flare-up of diseases like these .
Not exactly what anybody has in mind . )
 
When we find that we really need the spread of infectious vectors to stay healthy , then we know we have really screwed ourselves .
 
These are the two main boundaries .
The literature is full of other limits the series can approach . Keep a clear head on what the physical significance is .
 
Fat
I cannot leave the subject without the thing closest to human hearts : appearance .
Fat and fitness  .
Sadly , the present fad for leanness is just that . The period of superfluous food is coming to an end .
Rich individuals can afford to be lean because the reserves are in the monetary wealth  Women have to bear children individually , so they cannot store the needed reserves externally . Hence their fat storage is close to the theoretical optimum even in Western societies (33%) . In other societies the percentage is about 37-40% .
 
Human males have been bred (Mk III humans) for muscle and little fat (8% in a superbly fit male) . He does not have reserves to withstand even garrison duty (even little diseases will lay him low .) Note the frequent references to diseases laying whole armies low .
 
Note what is left out : the camp-followers . They survived  The women and babyfat children . Every army seeded the invaded area with women and children .
 
The bred soldier has to eat a high-carb food frequently : not meat or fat , his body cannot store it . This is the definition of a wheat-eating legionary .
 
Ho ! Ho! Ho!
The Atkinson diet .
No wonder it does not make sense in evolutionary terms .
Mesomorphic humans have been bred not to transform expensive proteins and fats into bodymass .
 
The soldier-class were kept on a carbohydrate leash , which could only be supplied by farming .
 
 
The Smell of Horses .
 
Horses exude pheromones that promote body-leanness in humans . This has an obvious advantage to horses . Horses are breeding jockeys .
 
The time-span is enough : at least 8 000 years . (400 generations)
 
Because pregnant women cannot ride horses , there was a selection pressure to breed horses who have a pheromone that block female dominance pheromones , especially since females have to weigh more because of fat-reserve considerations .
 
Outside a farming environment , horses will sculpt their riders as much as the riders are sculpting them .
 
Small Mongolian ponies , small Mongolians .
 
This is why alpha-males like horses and horse-dominated societies were able to conquer and keep matriarchies .
 
Note the effect of the pheromones on women riders . Androgeny .
On males it becomes extreme blockage of oestrogen . It seems like a surge of male hormones , but it is just an imbalance . (If too much male hormones , the men just kill their horses )
 
This is why the auto-mobile had such a big sociological effect . No horses , so the men became more effeminate .
 
Want to be Lean and Mean ?
Sniff Horse sweat pheromone .
Perfumiers take note .
 
Dogs
 
The other leg of the human-horse-dog triumvirate .
Dogs accept female pack-leaders and have evolutionary reasons for blocking horse inhibitions of human female pheromones .
 
While the males are away , the females look after and rely on the dogs .
(The reason why Mongols ride from yurt to yurt: they are too scared of the dogs.)
 
With dogs around , the male testosterone activity is ameliorated . This is a well known effect , especially if horses are around .
 
Hence the female love of lap-dogs . They are actually quite ferocious , and exude large amounts of pheromones that soothes the savage male breast .
 
Your attention is drawn to the Pekinese lapdog , which has had a disproportionately large effect on human history .
 
If this sounds convoluted , it is because this is exactly how this type of bio-system operates : by inhibitions of inhibitions of inhibitions ,etc .
 
Andre
 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.