Souls .

Andre Willers

30 Jul 2010

Safety :

This is unsafe at any level .

Synopsis :

Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?

Discussion :

Why should a soul weigh anything ?

Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .

It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .

The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .

So , thought has mass .

But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .

Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .

Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .

This Locale:

It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .

It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :

1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads

2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads

3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads

4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads

5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads

Does the Soul survive physical Death ?

It had better .

Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.

Why Locales ? (ie Universes)

It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .

And so it goes .

Andre

## Friday, July 30, 2010

### Souls .

Souls .

Andre Willers

30 Jul 2010

Safety :

This is unsafe at any level .

Synopsis :

Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?

Discussion :

Why should a soul weigh anything ?

Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .

It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .

The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .

So , thought has mass .

But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .

Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .

Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .

This Locale:

It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .

It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :

1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads

2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads

3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads

4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads

5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads

Does the Soul survive physical Death ?

It had better .

Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.

Why Locales ? (ie Universes)

It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .

And so it goes .

Andre

Andre Willers

30 Jul 2010

Safety :

This is unsafe at any level .

Synopsis :

Why does a human soul weigh 21 gm ? And an animal soul much less ?

Discussion :

Why should a soul weigh anything ?

Answer : humans are Beth(3) entities . Beth(0) are random in a "Flipping-the-coin" sense .

It is expected that statistical anomalies would occur . This is the definition of life . If this is a scalar function , weight would always increase with Beth(x) : is it is a energy function .

The probability packing packs in energy , increasing the scalar mass .

So , thought has mass .

But 21 gm mass has an energy in this locale of 21x10^(2x10) ergs , which is in the range of a small nuclear device .

Needless to say , when somebody dies , he does not go up in a mushroom cloud in this locale . We also have to ask where the energy came from , originally .

Now you see why there is so little quotable research . The 21 gm is derived from research by MacDougal in the 19th century , when men were men , and bicycles had no gears .

This Locale:

It can be succinctly described as a Zero-sum , Aristotelian Framework .

It is normally inhabited by entities having the following characteristics :

1.Kindergarden (soul < 21 gm) Pin heads

2.Holiday (soul ~ 21 gm) Fart heads

3.Competing (soul > 21 gm) Ass heads

4.Caretakers : (soul > 21 gm) Fatuous heads

5.Inspectors : (soul >> 21 gm) Fat heads

Does the Soul survive physical Death ?

It had better .

Having spontaneous nuclear explosions at every death is a bit of a no-no.

Why Locales ? (ie Universes)

It is easier to break it up in smaller pieces for the small ones .

And so it goes .

Andre

## Tuesday, July 27, 2010

### Error Detection .

Error Detection .

Andre Willers .

27 Jul 2010

"I beseech you , in the bowels of Christ , think it possible that you may be mistaken ."

Oliver Cromwell , 3 Aug 1650 AD .

Safety :

These following algorithms are unsafe at any level .

Pockets of stable stochastic Beth(n) resonances in a space-time system

(where defined ) are possible .

Synopsis :

Unknown.

Discussion :

Error in Aristotelian systems are described as a logical contradiction . This is , however , merely taken as the generation of a new dimension (cf i = (-1)^(1/2) , irrational numbers , transcendental numbers , etc ) .

This is possible because of the fact that A + (~A) < Universum , as previously discussed .

Minimum Necessary Sufficient number of tests :

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , "Tarot" et al .

You actually need only 27 tests , which , if correctly formulated , can show whether a system is self-consistent for any particular ArithI and ArithII .

This is a Pocket . Inside this pocket we can talk with some confidence whether things remain coherent . This degree of confidence can be denoted by Beth(x) . Whether x is infinitesimally smooth or quantal depends on local conditions .

Time:

Note that in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , there is only one term with degree one that can construe the Diophantine equations to 26 dimensions . This can be interpreted as a time-dimension . Of course , more time dimensions are possible , but they will be curled up . It seems there is only one general time-dimension in any possible universe (pocket) , but sub-times are possible , as well as varying rates between pockets (universes) .

Are we in a Simulation?

A perennial question . Now at least you have some basis of formulating some experiments . You only need 27 experiments .

Good luck (Beth(x-> J ) )

Complexification:

Order out of Randomness . Inherent in defining things as separate .

There is a netto probability osmotic pressure between Beth(n+1) -> Beth(n) . Things get more complicated if they are defined .

Delicious !!

And if you add the "Non-definition" of something , the complexity is enhanced by an order of 2^N , where N is the thingies in the multiverse .

General testing :

Can the system be tested without running the whole system ?

This translates into a into a summation of all the possible ways the combinations of a delineated system can fail . This is 2^27 ~ 1.34x10^8 .

The important point is that it is finite .

You can have a finite battery of tests for each pocket .The number of pockets in 26 dimensions are finite , but not in 27 dimensions .

See Aneuploidy in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Prodigies , Primitives and Cancers" 10/5/2007 .

And so it goes .

Dimensionally yours

Andre

Andre Willers .

27 Jul 2010

"I beseech you , in the bowels of Christ , think it possible that you may be mistaken ."

Oliver Cromwell , 3 Aug 1650 AD .

Safety :

These following algorithms are unsafe at any level .

Pockets of stable stochastic Beth(n) resonances in a space-time system

(where defined ) are possible .

Synopsis :

Unknown.

Discussion :

Error in Aristotelian systems are described as a logical contradiction . This is , however , merely taken as the generation of a new dimension (cf i = (-1)^(1/2) , irrational numbers , transcendental numbers , etc ) .

This is possible because of the fact that A + (~A) < Universum , as previously discussed .

Minimum Necessary Sufficient number of tests :

See http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , "Tarot" et al .

You actually need only 27 tests , which , if correctly formulated , can show whether a system is self-consistent for any particular ArithI and ArithII .

This is a Pocket . Inside this pocket we can talk with some confidence whether things remain coherent . This degree of confidence can be denoted by Beth(x) . Whether x is infinitesimally smooth or quantal depends on local conditions .

Time:

Note that in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "The inside of zero" , there is only one term with degree one that can construe the Diophantine equations to 26 dimensions . This can be interpreted as a time-dimension . Of course , more time dimensions are possible , but they will be curled up . It seems there is only one general time-dimension in any possible universe (pocket) , but sub-times are possible , as well as varying rates between pockets (universes) .

Are we in a Simulation?

A perennial question . Now at least you have some basis of formulating some experiments . You only need 27 experiments .

Good luck (Beth(x-> J ) )

Complexification:

Order out of Randomness . Inherent in defining things as separate .

There is a netto probability osmotic pressure between Beth(n+1) -> Beth(n) . Things get more complicated if they are defined .

Delicious !!

And if you add the "Non-definition" of something , the complexity is enhanced by an order of 2^N , where N is the thingies in the multiverse .

General testing :

Can the system be tested without running the whole system ?

This translates into a into a summation of all the possible ways the combinations of a delineated system can fail . This is 2^27 ~ 1.34x10^8 .

The important point is that it is finite .

You can have a finite battery of tests for each pocket .The number of pockets in 26 dimensions are finite , but not in 27 dimensions .

See Aneuploidy in http://andreswhy.blogspot.com "Prodigies , Primitives and Cancers" 10/5/2007 .

And so it goes .

Dimensionally yours

Andre

### Unlimited Energy

Unlimited Energy

Andre Willers

4 Jul 2010

Safety :

This technology would not easy to apply or change human nature . Hence safe.

Synopsis:

An energy tap using Pauli-exclusion principle.

Discussion:

The periodic table is revisited:

The standard Periodic table is of normal (x,y) two dimensional form for this universe .

This translates as Group and Period arrangements of number of protons and electron orbitals .

Fractional configurations are possible (quarks , etc) , but not very stable .

The General Expression:

(x1+dx1,y1+dy1) -> (lambda1) (x2+dx2,y2+dy2)

<- (lambda2)

where x is Group , y is Period , d prefix denotes change and Lambda denotes Energy and concentration transfers .

The possibilities :

1.Lambda1 = Lambda2 :

This includes stable elements and radioactive breakdown .

2. Lambda1 > Lambda2 :

Explosion . White hole .

3. Lambda1 < Lambda2 :

Implosion .

4 Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :

An oft-neglected logical possibility

This Point 4 translates as an Energy Tap .

The Pauli-principle :

Loosely , this states that two things cannot be the same . But if two things of similar energy tries to do it , one has to go into Absolute Elsewhere . But the principle of Conservation of Energy necessitates it to pop out elsewhere .

Where does this happen ?

Where matter gets squashed .

Around black holes , neutron stars , nova's and singularities .

As the matter gets squashed before the event-horizen stage , Pauli-exclusion gets violated . A significant percentage of energy vanishes to appears elsewhere .

Where does it go ?

If it does not resurface , human systems will treat it as Dark Matter . The lack of gravitational attraction will be interpreted as a negative-gravity .

Entropy :

Systems capable of pulling energy out of the plenum is essential to the continued existence of the universes . This means Civilizations . As suspected , high-level positive feedback systems (AI 4+) are needed for the continued existence of this plenum .

Is there any energy left ?

Previous Level III Civilizations would have used a lot . But pulses of new energy appears all the time , at managable intensities .

How to tap it .

Look again at The General Expression above .

Preparations to start Lambda1 > Lambda2 systems will cause the activation of old weapon systems dating back millions of years . Uncontrolled White holes will not be tolerated within a Galactic Milieu .

This leaves possibility 4 . Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :

This translates into rapidly changing states .

Eg the correct choice of rapidly interacting elements and isotopes can suck energy out of the plenum without blowing you up . And if this sounds crazy , remember that a pound of pure metal like Plutonium can blow you to mc square .

Vibrations and resonances .

And please don’t piss off the Galactics too much . AI's of an order less than 4 will simply exterminate you .

Andre .

Andre Willers

4 Jul 2010

Safety :

This technology would not easy to apply or change human nature . Hence safe.

Synopsis:

An energy tap using Pauli-exclusion principle.

Discussion:

The periodic table is revisited:

The standard Periodic table is of normal (x,y) two dimensional form for this universe .

This translates as Group and Period arrangements of number of protons and electron orbitals .

Fractional configurations are possible (quarks , etc) , but not very stable .

The General Expression:

(x1+dx1,y1+dy1) -> (lambda1) (x2+dx2,y2+dy2)

<- (lambda2)

where x is Group , y is Period , d prefix denotes change and Lambda denotes Energy and concentration transfers .

The possibilities :

1.Lambda1 = Lambda2 :

This includes stable elements and radioactive breakdown .

2. Lambda1 > Lambda2 :

Explosion . White hole .

3. Lambda1 < Lambda2 :

Implosion .

4 Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :

An oft-neglected logical possibility

This Point 4 translates as an Energy Tap .

The Pauli-principle :

Loosely , this states that two things cannot be the same . But if two things of similar energy tries to do it , one has to go into Absolute Elsewhere . But the principle of Conservation of Energy necessitates it to pop out elsewhere .

Where does this happen ?

Where matter gets squashed .

Around black holes , neutron stars , nova's and singularities .

As the matter gets squashed before the event-horizen stage , Pauli-exclusion gets violated . A significant percentage of energy vanishes to appears elsewhere .

Where does it go ?

If it does not resurface , human systems will treat it as Dark Matter . The lack of gravitational attraction will be interpreted as a negative-gravity .

Entropy :

Systems capable of pulling energy out of the plenum is essential to the continued existence of the universes . This means Civilizations . As suspected , high-level positive feedback systems (AI 4+) are needed for the continued existence of this plenum .

Is there any energy left ?

Previous Level III Civilizations would have used a lot . But pulses of new energy appears all the time , at managable intensities .

How to tap it .

Look again at The General Expression above .

Preparations to start Lambda1 > Lambda2 systems will cause the activation of old weapon systems dating back millions of years . Uncontrolled White holes will not be tolerated within a Galactic Milieu .

This leaves possibility 4 . Lambda1 < > Lambda2 :

This translates into rapidly changing states .

Eg the correct choice of rapidly interacting elements and isotopes can suck energy out of the plenum without blowing you up . And if this sounds crazy , remember that a pound of pure metal like Plutonium can blow you to mc square .

Vibrations and resonances .

And please don’t piss off the Galactics too much . AI's of an order less than 4 will simply exterminate you .

Andre .

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)